So A Texas Judge rules to validate a transgender man’s marriage to a woman. The case is the first win of its kind. This without a doubt a victory, but this victory has a bittersweet tase to it. As we all know , well should know, Nikki Araguz is in the process of long appeal after her marriage to her husband was voided by a Texas judge after the death of her firefighter husband. Also in 1999, Christie Littleton’s marriage was deemed null and void as well after se attempted to go against a doctor for malpractice which resulted in her husband’s death. So that is two transgender women denied. Yet here we are another marriage case but with a transgender man, and his marriage is deemd valid and therefore respected. Is this just a coincidence? I dont think so. This that male privilege tat we all have discuss subtle. You hear its while watching FTMs talk about how they feel more empowered to speak and and be heard in the mist to other moreso that when the were living a sthere prior selves. That same male privilege that allows Ftms to get there top surgery to remove breast paid for under insurance because gynecomastia is cover by insurance. It is not consider cosmetic because God formid a male have breasts. That just have to be a medical condition that needs to be fix. Yet top surgery for MTFs are consider cosmetic and are not covers by medical insurance. Now this blog is not to imply that MTFs dont have some form of privilege that come with transition because we as well. I just want to bring it to the attention of my reader to show how full of shit our justice and social system is. Male privilege, bio or not, and misogyny shows up in the most obscure forms and situations. Anywho Like I said this a victory and I will looking at it as a step in the right direction hopefully toward many more.

-
Diamond Stylz’s Twitter
- What city and state are you representing? instagram.com/p/Zm639xCYcN/ 1 day ago
- Can't touch shit #jackd instagram.com/p/Zmu_FpCYWN/ 1 day ago
- Just posted a photo instagram.com/p/Zmlu5TiYQW/ 1 day ago
- Great service in the day horrible at night (@ McDonald's - @mcd_houston) 4sq.com/10OnitG 1 day ago
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist youtu.be/BzBwtO1LEYY?a Why Im Voting Vote For That Guy That WINS 2 days ago
Blogroll
- Diamond Stylz Beauty Blog Fashion & Beauty
- Diamond Stylz Youtube Channel Urban TransFlower Blooming
- Gentleman's View
- My Lucky Star
- My Personal Natural Hair Goddess WhoisSugar
- Perspectives Of Grace Social Liberal Fiscal Conservative
- Renaissanceman Just A Smart Cool Guy
- Smart Warm Man – Ahmier
- Transgriot Informative Opinionate Trans
- Winnona: A Bitch For Justice
- XD Experience Gay & Witty
- Ya Boi Newnue My Handsome YT Brother
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010

gynecomastia is of course caused by excessive use of steroids.’
Our very own blog site
http://www.healthmedicinecentral.com/inflamed-pancreas/
Is it really male privilege as much as different people ruling on different cases? This judge may have been very liberal and interpreted the laws in a way which produced this outcome while the law was determined a different way Nikki’s case. I don’t know the reason for the differing results, since I haven’t kept up with the cases but I don’t know if one of the reasons would actually be male privilege.
forgot to add this is a big victory either way for all TS individuals
.
Thank could be the case…..could not be….I just find it interesting that the win precedent would be the transman case of divorce and marital dysfunction….and the two cases dened prior were two transwomen cases of unexpected deaths. Seem fishy to me
Yeah one woudl have to look at the 2 cases and see where things were different. I honestly didnt even read the facts of the current case so maybe be alot of considerations to take into account for the different results.